<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cyber-Resilience on microsegment.io</title>
    <link>https://microsegment.io/tags/cyber-resilience/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Cyber-Resilience on microsegment.io</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://microsegment.io/tags/cyber-resilience/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Backup Infrastructure Needs Its Own Containment Boundary</title>
      <link>https://microsegment.io/post/2026-07-28-backup-infrastructure-needs-containment/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://microsegment.io/post/2026-07-28-backup-infrastructure-needs-containment/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most backup strategies start with copies, retention, and restore speed.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Attackers start with reachability.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Can a compromised production administrator reach the backup console? Does the backup platform trust the production identity provider? Can ordinary server networks connect to repositories or storage management interfaces? Can a shared virtualization manager delete both workloads and their recovery points?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If the answer is yes, the backup environment is not outside the blast radius. It is simply another management plane inside it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
